IMPACTTECTONICS.ORG
BLOG Rev. 2022-06-12
Gregory Charles Herman, PhD Flemington, New Jersey, USA
Punctuated Tectonic Equilibrium
Introduction
|
Another pivotal moment occurred during my senior year in a 400-level, Global Tectonics seminar taught by Damian and Dr. Thomas Worseley, an acclaimed stratigraphic oceanographer. At that time, Damian and Tom were formulating their 'pulsating Pangaea' hypothesis of repeated, supercontinent assembly and fragmentation following the principles of the newly proposed Wilson cycle. Our class of about six upperclassmen had the privilege of participating in lively discussions and debate on the subject after delving into weekly reading assignments that fueled the desire. Their hypotheses were based on the work of Tuzo Wilson (1966) who first recognized and documented the probability of having reoccurring episodes of supercontinent assembly and fragmentation.
At that time and prior to the advent and use of global positions systems (GPS) along with modern, digital cartography, we were taught that Africa was relatively immobile on Earth's surface, and that supercontinent breakup and separation likely stemmed from thermal welting of a relatively immobile continental lithospheric that slowly rose above sea level, and with deep continental roots that provided a thermal blanket above upward-rising mantle plumes off Earth's core. Africa's relative non-mobility when compared with surrounding continents was deduced form the hot-spot reference frame that we relied upon before the deployment of satellites to measure actual plate motions. Earth's hot-spots are very Africa-centric because the largest mantle plume lies beneath Africa. But now we know that Africa is indeed moving too, in concert with the other lithospheric plates, and there is a myriad of motivating mechanisms that propel Earth's exterior plates around its surface. And so, my scientific viewpoints on tectonics have evolved in a lifetime, and echo the principles of punctuated equilibrium, insofar as local stresses cause subsequent adaptations that tend to quickly proliferate and then fester over time until the next revolution. Considering that both biological and tectonic revolutions are spurred by the same mechanisms, periodic bolide bombardment and accretion with mountain building and subsequent development of large igneous provinces, this approach provides a framework from within which we can achieve a more comprehensive and thorough understanding of Earth's history and evolution.
After having studied and practiced structural geology and tectonics throughout most of my life, I have come to realize that plate-tectonic theory has a critical flaw from the general geological communities' reluctance to include grounded stresses from catastrophic, large-bolide impacts as motivating agents of tectonic cycles. Uniformitarianism, the modern, guiding principle of geology may account for processes operating 99% of the time, but it's the 1% catastrophic forces that perturb the existing equilibrium and forces new biological, tectonic revolutions to occur rapidly thereafter, until stasis is achieved, or a new equilibrium is reached. Others have noted this flaw in applying exclusive gradualism and uniformity, and in particular I draw you attention to the work of Ursula Marvin, a Harvard-Smithsonian NASA geologist that also recognizes the need to elevate global catastrophism into a more comprehensive plate-tectonic theory. Following is a quote from Dr. Marvin's essay published in 1990 on Impact and its revolutionary implications for geology from Geological Society of America Special Paper 247, Global Catastrophes in Earth History:
"Impact-generated craters, eruptions,
wildfires, and extinctions, whether they are sporadic or periodic, have no place
in the serene uniformitarian world of Hutton and Lyell, or
the world that has been envisioned by the geological
community for the past two centuries. Rather than to invert
the definition of a venerable word, it is time to recognize
that bolide impacts is a geological process of major
importance, which by its very nature, demolishes uniformitarianism
itself as the basic principle of geology."
You are spot on Ursula. I argue that punctuated equilibrium is a more applicable principle for tectonics that more appropriately accounts for Earth's destructive perturbations and subsequent blooms.
LIP Triggers and Crustal Tsunamis
The repeated pairing of large-bolide impacts and igneous LIPS in time indicates the probability that hypervelocity impacts suddenly rupture the lithosphere and trigger the release of igneous melts, especially where the lithosphere is suddenly extended in the wake of oblique impacts like that seen for the Syria-Sinai Planums impact-strewn field on Mars with respect to Olympus Mons and Tharsis Montes. Decompression melting of partially-melted mantle material outside of the 660 kilometers shock envelope occurs along large extensional faults formed in extensional blast sectors arising from an oblique impact, which most impacts are in nature.
As I recently pointed in the 2020 blog Beyond the Craters, recorded human history only reflects time when plate tectonics has operated at the gradual rates that we characterize using uniformitarian principles. Relatively constant, horizontal plate motions on the order of millimeters to centimeters per year are the standard course stemming from recent, empirical observations. But catastrophic, instantaneous propagation of seismic waves radiating outward away from a large-impact sites are difficult to fathom because they can hypothetically raise mountains suddenly when terra firma gets rung like a bell and its carpet gets rumpled and welted. We have not experienced this as modern humans and our established viewpoints reflect our geological viewpoints gained over a mere two centuries. If we theoretically recognize the potential of impact tectonics to suddenly impart widespread tectonic revolutions as part of plate-tectonic theory we then become aligned with Gould and Eldredge's (1977) punctuated equilibrium as a more inclusive guiding principle of plate-tectonic theory, one that directly reflects our discretization of time. As Gould (1987) wisely stated “if we equate uniformity with the truth and relegate the empirical claims of catastrophism to the hush-hush unthinkable of theology, then we enshrine one narrow version of geological process as true a priori, and we lose the possibility of weighing reasonable alternatives.” One such alternative tectonic viewpoint is that of Buthman (2022) that repeatedly illustrates the natural resource potential of large, multi-ringed impact basins on Earth and the relative importance of such structures as part of the tectonic process.
And now, here we humans are as an animal species on Earth, sometimes ruminating on the causes and effects of mountain and basin-forming events during a time of tectonic status. I can only imagine what the experience must be like to watch a large asteroid enter the atmosphere and impact the planetary surface with such ferocity that the crust is instantly compounded, faulted, and warped into new structures. In all likelihood, it would be a brief human experience for the only way to survive such events would be to have safe haven in an underground or subaqueous facility at some remote distance from ground zero because of the severe, ensuing atmospheric and ground disruption. But imagine if you will the propagation of the seismic body and surface waves generated by the impact as they dissipate and spread about, aligned with circumferential basins and mountains. These events have helped build mountainous structures and large basins around us in a geological instant. They raise welts on the planetary surface with amplitudes now mapped as the highest and deepest land positions on Earth. And yet, we continue to ignore these effects in plate-tectonic theory. Perhaps because we're afraid of the implications from feeling hapless in prevention. For whatever reason, it's a shame, because until we do integrate the effects of catastrophic and perhaps periodic bombardment of Earth by large asteroids and comets into their rightful place in our tectonic legacy, we are truly missing the mark.
References
Bond, D.P.G. and Grasby, S. E., 2020, Late Ordovician mass extinction caused by volcanism, warming, and anoxia, not cooling and glaciation: Geology v. 48 , no. 8, p. 777–781. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G47377.1
Buthman, D. B., 2022, Impact crater tectonics; The future of resource exploration: Published in the United States, 285 p. ISBN: 979-8-9853971-0-0
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J., 1972, Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism", in "Models in paleobiology": Schopf, T.J.M., ed., Freeman, Cooper & Co, San Francisco, pp. 82-115
Racki, G., Rakociński, M., Marynowski, L., and Wignall, P.B., 2018, Mercury enrichments and the Frasnian-Famennian biotic crisis: A volcanic trigger proved?: Geology v. 46, no. 6, p. 543–546, doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G40233.1
Rampino, M.R., and K. Caldeira, 2018: Comparison of the ages of large-body impacts, flood-basalt eruptions, ocean-anoxic events and extinctions over the last 260 million years: A statistical study. Int. J. Earth Sci., 107, no. 2, 601-608, doi:10.1007/s00531-017-1513-6.
Wilson, J. Tuzo (1966). "Did the Atlantic Close and then Re-Open?": Nature, v. 211, p. 676–681. doi:10.1038/211676a0. ISSN 0028-08